How to win friends and influence capitols

 

I am personally a fan of the primitive Judeo-christian church. The men and women who spread out from ancient Jerusalem and Galilee throughout the Roman world after the crucifixion of Jesus are among the most remarkable people in history. Those who followed in their footsteps and example did something absolutely extraordinary.

We are all pretty familiar with the story of Jesus. He came to ancient Israel as the promised Messiah. He was not received by the religious and political authorities of Israel and, it can be said with a great deal of truth, that the reason for this is because they were looking for a political messiah, a great king who would save the Jewish nation from the boot of Rome. The message and life of Jesus didn’t quite fit what folks had in mind. Rather, this Jesus’s primary purpose on earth was to save the Jewish people, and all mankind, from their sins.

But, I think there is an interesting aspect to this story that gets overlooked. I offer a little thought experiment. Consider it a Lenten exercise:

Imagine if Jesus had told the Jews of his day that he was,without question the Jewish Messiah, and was indeed the political messiah who would achieve the following, if all those who followed him would do as he commanded of them:

“I, Jesus, do not want you to fight great battles for me.  As great soldiers, you are willing to die for me. And indeed, we will win a great victory for our nation by your willingness to die for me. And this is how:

“I call on all of you to live good holy lives. Love your neighbors, give and care for them. Worship me but be good Roman citizens. Honor Caesar. Give Caesar what is his, and God what is God’s. Do this and Caesar will come to destroy you.

“You are willing to die for me and for the Kingdom of God, so do so. Allow yourselves, as my followers, to be arrested for worshiping me, and allow yourselves to be thrown to the lions. The Romans will make sport of you in their great arenas. Bless them who do this and do not curse them.  Do that for about 300 or so years, while caring for the poor and sick and I, Jesus the Messiah, will guarantee you of this: Rome the capital of a world, will fall down and worship their Jewish Messiah, and offer allegiance to me.”

Of course, Jesus pretty much said this, in his own way. One will notice that if one reads his Sermon on the Mount and others of his sayings and commands.

Detractors of Christianity like to point to the terrible job the Christian church did once it gained political and religious power and authority. They point to the crusades, the inquisitions, the bloody and terrible religious wars of the 1550-1700, etc. And much of that is fair game. Christianity was not ready to run things when Constantine turned the keys of his kingdom to those who worshiped the Jewish Messiah. But the Church Constantine turned the keys over to – that church was pretty remarkable.

That is the church to be.

 

 

 

Author: EPMichels

Former journalist and Marketing Director, and a fellow who likes to write about religion and politics. email me at rickmichels82@gmail.com

4 thoughts on “How to win friends and influence capitols”

  1. Great article 🙂 I think the world is finally–FINALLY–beginning to understand, on the macro scale, the difference between a rationalist’s criticisms of Judeo-Christian religion (‘All holy texts are equally barbaric and equally fabricated, therefore NONE of what those texts contain should be considered valid!’) and an empiricist’s criticisms (‘Look, there are specific consequences of specific beliefs. And specific doctrines engender often unpredictable beliefs in the adherents who read those doctrines. The net outcome is more important than the source material–and if we look at religions individually through *this* lens, we can see striking and game-changing differences between them.’)

    Sam Harris, the famed atheist (anti-theist?) champions the latter approach within the atheist community and–somewhat shockingly–he *seems* to be nearly alone in having adopted that position. The rest of the ‘atheist’ community falls into the same ideologically homogeneous ‘rationalist’ category described above.

    And anyone who can take the 30,000 foot view of Christendom vs. the Islamic world can see that–for whatEVER reason–there are indeed massive, sweeping, species-changing differences between these respective cultures.

    Like

    1. I like what Sam said in that debate with Ben Affleck on Bill Maher’s show. Ben said something about Islam having some bad ideas. Sam says Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas.

      It needs a reformation, and like you say, Sam is a pretty strong atheist. But he’s got a pragmatic streak.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. That Batfleck/Harris clash was one of the sparks that set off the rationalist vs. empiricist war within the contemporary Left–and that spark is a big reason why we’ve got people like Dave Rubin getting famous on YouTube for doing *nothing more* than letting his guests describe their positions in their own way without facing a belligerent show host. He’s a rising internet star, for sure.

        Like

  2. Batfleck! LOL. Thanks for the tip on Rubin. I checked his youtube channel. What a trove of what looks like great conversation! I moved first to the Dennis Prager interview. I loved this line from Rubin: “Defending my liberal values is becoming a conservative position.”

    By the way, this is still Rick here. Fiddling with redoing my whole social media persona with this new blog and all.

    Thanks for the kinds words btw. Regarding empiricism and religion, I think it really is what really matters: is it working as advertised? Is what you are looking for what you are getting? People turn to religion for different reasons, but usually because they want to change, hopefully for the better, and usually internally. They seek peace, they seek relief from doubt, fear, dissatisfaction, etc. Bottom line: it has to work. If it ain’t working, then, yes, like you said in a recent post, you gotta reform it. Maybe the actual principles of your religion don’t need reform. They may be correct. But reform how you approach them, or how they are being twisted by the leadership.

    Thanks for weighing in Caleb!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s